5682 - Jeans, Airlie, DG2

The DG2 Crotch Shape

I not only read you comments, but I take them to heart. So when it was suggested that I buy a new pair of my DG2 jeans and trace that crotch, I thought “Why not?”.  Just so happens Diane Gilman had just put her jeans on sale. I pay between $60-80 for DG2 jeans. I didn’t need another pair but for $30 I couldn’t pass the sale up. I used this opportunity to buy a slightly different color, Olive, that still needs my needs for my bottoms to be neutral. I wouldn’t wear olive with every color in the rainbow. But I can’t think of a thing in my closet I would not pair with the Olive jeans. I know it might not always be the best color combination but it will look OK.  So with suggestion from TheYellowRose in my ear and a new pair of DG2 jeans in hand, “Why not?”

I used the masking tape method.

It goes pretty fast. Does use a lot of tape. I didn’t copy the entire leg. I copied the back from yoke to 4″ of inseam. The front I copied from waistband to 4″ of inseam. Once taped, I carefully removed and placed on tissue paper where I smoothed and firmly pressed.

Before trimming away the excess tissue and stray tape ends to reveal a neat copy:

 

Next step was comparing with my 5682 and the Airlie pant. I still have the tissue on which I copied both patterns. 5682 is the Orange colored lines; Airlie is in blue. I tried to align crotch point and upright with each for a pic.  BACKS:

FRONT

It’s hard for me to pinpoint the grain of fabric after it’s sewn so I did try to align grain lines.

I was surprised at how different the DG2 is from either 5682 or Airlie. I thought Airlie would have less circumference being as the fabric recommended has 40% stretch while the DG2 measures 20-25%.

Over all, I thought DG2 would be very close to 5682 (orange lines). It was stunningly different both front and back.

I satisfied my curiosity but otherwise, not sure where I am going with this.  Your comments and suggestions are again, more than welcome.

 

Advertisements
Airlie, StyleArc

Knock Knees? Hyper-extended Calf?

After my last post (8/7), I really thought I was done not only with this muslin, but with the Airlie pattern. My Plan …Z had been to morph 5682 to include the Airlie pocket, a straight-elasticized waistband and join the yoke to the back leg. Then a couple of people suggested some possible alterations I had not considered.

 

KNOCK KNEES

Knock Knees are defined as knees that turn in-ward so that the feet are apart when the knees touch. Mine don’t actually turn-inward but I have a pad of fat which becomes larger as I gain weight (and incidentally years). The fat pad can have the effect of knock knees.  When I’m posing for fit pictures, I always try to stand with my feet about as far apart as my shoulders, about 6-7″. My knees are not touching. Any touching seen is excess fabric hanging towards my center of gravity.  In the past, I have a couple of knock knee alterations; without success. But there is no harm in trying something new. I was allowed to see a page from Sandra Betzina’s book  Fast Fit title. I owned that book in the past and a few others she wrote.  I have enormous respect for Sandra.  I’m a believer that she knows wherefore of which  she speaks. But her books leave me discombobulated. My books end up with more post-its than print.  I just can never find the info a second time without asking someone for help.  When I want a quick double-check, I don’t want to be delayed 2 days. I’ve given  all her books in my possession to others but I was happy enough for someone to remind me of and allow me to see this page “Knock Knees”.  I won’t post pic because I’m positive it is  copyrighted. I will however add some discussion and my own photos.  I think I’m in the clear for having given Sandra full credit. The way the law is these days, you never know. Anyway, you are to slice the leg horizontally about an inch below the crotch point. Attach a 2 or 3″ strip of fabric:

Then you rejoin the lower leg at an angle. Mine spreads 1″ at the crotch (I decided I had a lot of wrinkles and needed a lot of fix); and overlaps 1″ at the side seam

Do on both front and back. Stitch leg back together and take pics:

Curious, I took 2 sets of pics which I’m sharing, one with my knees touching the other as I’m normally standing for fitting. To determine if there is an improvement caused by this alteration, we need to see the last fitting pics again:

I vote no. I don’t see any improvement. I may even see a few more wrinkles than there were before.  I also have a 2nd set of directions for basically the same issue and similar fix. The difference is that author does not overlap at the side seam. The wedge they add zeros at the side seam; opens at the inseam by the amount desired. If I’d seen any improvement following Sandra’s instructions, I might have tried again with the other set of instructions.

HYPER-EXTENDED CALF…

… was the second suggestion indirectly offered. By that I mean I was wasting time on Yahoo and came across a tube from Joy extolling the virtues of Angela Wolf’s Craftsy/Blueprint class on  sewing and fitting pants. I admire Angela and have taken several classes plus watched her shows on TV(PBS).   I’m happy to see a younger demographic and fresh ideas being exposed. Angela however does not compare in knowledge to Sandra. Don’t care about her FIT certificate. I have, too many times, yelled at the TV for something incorrect she shows or says. (I would never do that in person). It absolutely grates on my nerves that she, a professional, doesn’t know the vocabulary or why she is doing something. I believe words are important and it is important to use them correctly. Not saying I shouldn’t apologize for my short-comings but I really want a professional, who has the nerve to be telling me I’m wrong and should do it her way, I want her to use words correctly.  “Look at this here” is not a good description! Finger tapping that serves mostly to cover up the place I should be looking, doesn’t get it either. I also think if you don’t know why you are doing something, you are not leading the charge; you are blindly following along in the beaten path. In which case it is highly unlikely for you to ever develop and show me something new or different. The Craftsy class Joy was so excited about gives a perfect example of what I mean:

Angela freely admits that this shouldn’t work to fix the mess which bunches up on the backside of our pants. Nonetheless, her solution is to pinch out the amount of mess;  measure the pinch and then remove that amount across the back leg only. In her class she slashes the pattern piece and overlaps 2″.  Then she points in the direction of the hem and says in effect the back leg is too short now (you think?) and needs length added; slash and add here” as her finger waves in the air.   See, she both doesn’t know what the alteration does and doesn’t give specific instructions when she is in a  profession in which 1/8″ and 1/4″ are important. Grrr! But don’t let me turn you off. Not only do I make grammar and vocabulary mistakes, I am somewhat anal. My instructions would have started “Find and uncap your 1/4″ chisel Tip Sharpie….”  Lots of people justifiably complain that I put them to sleep before I get to the good stuff.

I’ve never even considered that I might have a hyper-extended calf. I did now. I can remember nearly all my life someone hissing at me to ‘unlock your knees’.  I do have a tendency to “lock them knees back” probably putting my calves in an hyper-extended position. Again, I thought,  nothing to lose by trying a different alteration.  Seems as though none of my logical solutions are working. Maybe it’s time to try something illogical?I did not repeat her exact alteration and I know that can make a difference because I’ve experence that with other alterations. Something have to be done exactly and in a specific order or you are wasting your time. I drew lines on the leg so I was sure to be cutting across grain but I didn’t cut. I folded and pinned…

…before running to the SM to stitch  1″ from the line. I made a tick mark 2″ above the front hem; aligned with the back hem and stitched the leg back to to the front.  Angela does warn that you need to retrue the inseam. But she didn’t have to deal with this:

I’ve got 2 dressmaking curves plus a bunch of smaller drafting curves. I twisted and turned; slide up and back. I could not make a nice arc using my curves. I finally free-handed about 5 lines

And finished stitching both the leg and the crotch before taking pics.

To be honest, I made both alterations at the same time. I made the Knock Knee on one leg, Hyper-Extended Calf on the other and took pics once. That’s why when you look at my pics, you consistently only see either right or left legs:

and as before side by side with the last fitting pics.

Once again, I don’t see any improvement. If you do, please point it out. I’d really love to find my fix. Ummm pants fitting fix, that is.

 

 

 

5682 - Jeans, Airlie

3 Pant Patterns Day 3: Grains Aligned

I have been examining my fitting pattern of 5682, the progressive tissues of Airlie and my unsewn DG2 jean. I’ve been looking at minutae trying to decide what is different and what effect it has. When my brain started smouldering I knew it was time for a different tack (sailing, not sewing).  Instead of the tissues, I compared 5682 with the original Airlie pattern.  I was again surprised at how closely they resembled each other. I’d almost swear they were drafted by the same person and changed only to eliminate the back yoke and add a different waistband. It seemed to me that all the changes were from the back yoke up. So why does it affect the back of the leg?  If not for the back of the leg, I’d wear Airlie Muslin 1

I was desperate, no doubt about that, but I also truly wanted to see the difference beween my fitted 5682 and Airlie.  In blue, I traced the original Airlie . Pinned the pocket in place so I was not having to account for pocket pieces. Not one more change to Airlie–at least at this point.  I placed 5682 on top and lined up the grain lines, before tracing my fitted 5682 on top in orage.  I added the yoke to 5682 and then belatedly, added the waistband to both.  Yoke, and waistbands were overlapped so that their seam allowances could be ignored.  Took Pictures. Well even though it’s only back and front, there are enough lines to be confunsing.  Also more than enough to start telling a different tale about these drafts.

The first thing I want to point out is how Airlie’s pocket sits.  I saw the same thing when I added the pocket to the Yellow Stripe 5682.  The side seam slopes sharpely up

On my body, the highest point is my center front waist everything slopes down to the sides and then gently from the sides up to CB.  The high side seam is not right for me.  I can see I need to open up the WB on the Yellow stripe and correct that immy.

Since were looking at the front, lets look at all of it but compared with the 5682.

So yes the 5682, orange, is much higher than Airlie, blue. But do recall that I had already added to Airlie for the muslins and I believe all of this has been accounted for. What I am really find interesting is the leg shape.  Earlier I aligned the pattern pieces on top of each other with the grain in the same direction but not matched.  For this comparison, I aligned grainlines and crotch points.  Crotch points may be slightly off because I’ve added length to the 5682 which is not in this tracing of the original. I’m taking points with a grain of salt, it is how the legs are distributing the circumferece and the actual shape of the crotch that caught my eye.  On 5682, there is less ease along the inseam more along the side seam. Interesting because I usually don’t need more along the side seam, I need in the seat area. I know with the muslins that the original crotch shape had been changed. However  Muslin 1 and Fit 1 were the nicests fit. None of the changes enhanced the front at all. Some made it worse .

And what we’ve all be waiting for, the Back:

The legs align much better .  5682, has a more ease along the entire side seam, but not much. 1/2″ at the most. The crotch is vastly different. Vastly. There is more ease in the inseam above the knee as well as more next to the crotch.  5682 crotch point is at least 1″ longer the Airlie. However the crotch upright is probably 3/4″ shorter and there isn’t nearly the scoop of the Airlie back crotch. No wonder further scooping and darting of the back didn’t help!

One further item I compared using the pants, is where the waist rests on my body. The both rest  right at my waist.  I made the test by putting the Airlie on and marking my body with a Sharpie; then putting the 5682 on and checking where it rested. It they are exactly together, it’s not more than a 1/16″ apart.   To me, it further attest to how similar these two pattern are. The change in the back crotch extension was done to 5682 by me. I added all that length which I know also added the extra by the inseam down to the knee. Where the crotch rises, I believe, is the real difference in the 2 crotches.

 

I have a question for all of you.  When I heard/read that people copy their crotch curve to a new pattern, I always assumed the copied just the test tube shape (in whatever form it has morphed) onto the new pattern.  Is that right, or do you copy more? do you include the waist? The side seam? Any part of the inseam?

 

 

 

5682 - Jeans, Airlie

3 Pant Patterns Day 2

So yesterday’s exercise was a lot of food for thought.  One of the questions which occurred to me was “how far/much different had the Airlie pant become from its original. So not comparing to the 5682 or the DG2 RTW jean, but to the original.  Most changes I made to Airlie were small or done in small increments. The largest at any time was a 1″ tuck for the leg length. The largest over all was adding 3″ to the total crotch extension ( 1.5″ when divided) which was done in 1/2” increments. I wondered with all the incremental changes, how different was the final?  So I smoothed out each of the backs (1, 2, &3) and compared each to the original, uncut pattern.  No pics because, white tissue on top of white paper photos like a picture of a big blank white board. Unfortunately for the visual orientated, this post will be entirely in words.

Comparing the Original back with #1.  The extra 1″ I added to the side seam for fit insurance is the first thing that jumps out at me but is of no consequence, really. It doesn’t change the shape and  was easily trimmed away.  Secondly of note is the 1/2″ added at the end of the crotch to make it longer and go further between my legs. I made the legs shorter, but didn’t think that affect the fit above the knee. The dart I made along CB crotch reduced the height 1″ as I needed. Surprisingly, and something I had not noted or even thought about, that dart changed the angle of the back crotch upright.  As originally drafted the back crotch leans slightly towards the side seam and away from the CB vertical. After the dart, the crotch leans the opposite and even passes the CB vertical.

Comparing Original with #2, the side seam has been reduced to 1/2″ over the 3/8″ drafted (i.e. is now 7/8″ instead of 1-3/8″), again not a biggie. The crotch is extended 1.5″ which is really out there and I noticed that it droops. Yes the point is 3/8″ lower than the original. Should it be?  I did the knee slash method of extending, which keeps all the pieces attached and creates a nice crotch curve. The point isn’t lower because of my error unless the instructions were supposed to say raise point xx” and I didn’t raise the point.   So,I note the drooping here, but not sure this is an error. I also note that the inseam has developed a sharp corner at the knee and somehow removes about 3/8″ knee circumference.  Maybe I give more significance than I should, but it reminds me I need to accommodate my  knobby knees.

Comparing Original with #3 the only real change I see is that the crotch upright now leans in the original direction (towards the side seam) and CB has moved towards the side seam 1.5″ from it’s original position. Hello?  Does anybody remember seeing that yesterday?

So that’s how that happened.

Sadly, these comparisons didn’t give me any new clues on how to fix the back wrinkles. It did occur to me that I had not done a typical alteration, that of shortening the side seam length. I seem to get these interesting folds extending from about the dart in front, across the side seam terminating beneath the dart in back. Picking up the side seam i.e. shortening the side seam length above the hip completely removes them. Copy that alteration to the pattern, and I do not ever again see those folds.  I didn’t recall having done that, so I took 5 minutes to rip out the waistband and drop it 1″ lower at the side seam tapering back to its place at both CF and CB. Nope, no help.

I’ve started wondering if it is a bad idea to choose pattern by girth. If I choose size based on my hip, then I need to shorten the back crotch length because pattern drafters assume the wider you get the taller you grow. Not true, and so I need to reduce the back crotch length.  Tummy/waist girth is assumed to be much smaller than hip/seat, unless pregnant. Not for me.  I have to add tummy room and finally front crotch height. See I need 3 alterations because I choose pattern size by the girth of my hips. Oh and usually I make a 4th alteration, adding 1″ width to the back and removing it from the front because I am not symmetrical i.e. there isn’t as much of me on the front as the back all up and down my frame but that isn’t because of my girth. It is because  I’m a similar to a large busted woman. Pattern makers measure the full bust circumference and divide that measurement in half to draft the top half of blouse.  The large busted woman finds she has too much fabric in back while the front strains to close and cover her assets and where most of her girth resides. This is so common that it  had been widely recognized and many patterns are now drafted with B C and D cup sizes i.e. larger circumference in front than in back or giving FBA instructions. I’m similar but on the other side of the waist i.e. more in front at the tummy switching to more in back at the seat.    Wouldn’t it have been better for me to start with something that fit my frame and added a little  ease where it is needed?  I’m choosing my top/blouse patterns by shoulders/frame. I usually make a large but I choose the size by comparing my TNT’s to the pattern.  Depending upon the draft, I may well use anything between small and extra large. Then I add at the seams between waist and seat. tops have gotten to be very easy fitting for me –although I should note that I often start with my “block” and simply append whatever style detail interests me in which case no fitting is needed.

 

Sigh, I think my brain is smouldering. Suffering from information overload. I’ve gone back in time to 10 years ago when my pants didn’t fit and I didn’t know why.

 

 

 

 

 

 

5682 - Jeans, Airlie

A Discussion of 3 Pant Patterns

Before starting this post, be sure you have your coffee/tea in hand and quite possibly a snack as this will be a long; laden with pictures. I will be discussing and comparing my experiences with 3 pants patterns

  1. Butterick B5682 a jeans pattern published by the Big 4 which has become my TNT. As I recall, it was amazingly easy to fit especially  because it was published by the Big 4.  It has been years, decades since I was able to fit and wear a Big 4 pant pattern.  Their crotch just didn’t fit.  I relied upon Kwik Sew for several years; then Burda.  The only consistently reliable pant pattern for me has been Trudy Jansen‘s 906 Designer Jean. I was surprised and delighted to be able to fit this Butterick pattern and it has become my basis for many pant adaptaions.  It is a jean pattern but more of a mom jean; not high fashion fit. It rests at the waist, with a narrow 1″ waistband extending just above. While it is a comfortable fit.  I agree that some tweaks need to be made so it is attractive.
  2. Style Arc Airlie a recent and deep disappointment for me. It’s not the 2 muslins, expense and waiting time and the innumberable fittings,  but rather the fact only a few years back Style Arc pant patterns were quick and easy for me to fit; and I mean I got a beautiful fit.  Knowing it had been quite some time since I’d been able to fit Style Arc patterns, I definitely hesitated to purchase Airlie.  I took the chance; ordered “all the way from Australia” and then felt deeply disappointed in myself with the repeated failures.
  3. The last pattern I will compare with is not actually a pattern, but rather my favorite RTW jean, the Diane Gilman 2, Baby Boot Cut Jean. I’ve loved this pant since the first time I slipped my legs into it.  It just felt good; really good. Immediately, due to my personal fit preferences, I went up one size over recommended. After a year, I switched from petite sizing to women’s petite because I have developed a thick waist. PW sizing gave me more than enough ease at the waist. I’d love to be able to duplicate the fit. So after about 6 years, I have a DG2 that has shrunk lengthwise.  I was about to shorten the leg and call it summer when I realized this could be the perfect opportunity to duplicate the fit.  I spent a few quality evenings with a seam ripper and extracted the front, back, yoke and waistband.

I’ve carefully pressed but those crotch points make no sense at all.  I also carefully measured the stretch in several places. Several because the pant is stretched out of shape much as we expect elderly clothes to do.  I measure between 20 to 25% stretch which is pretty standard in the fabric I buy. It was a relief to know that it isn’t entirely the stretch which is making this fit so nicely. That means, I may indeed be able to duplicate.

I am not addressing other pant patterns that I use and love because I am looking for something specific in these pants/patterns and review.  I am looking for a slacks fit i.e. slim, body skimming but not body revealing.  My other patterns and pant styles have their place in my wardrobe and in my life but  in this post I’m zeroing in on a semi-fitted  standard adapted for my body.

I preped for  this comparison by making sure the 3 patterns were distinctively different.  I figured RTW jeans would be obvious and mostly photogenic. I especially wanted to distinguish between 5682 and Airlie in pics. Painting 5682 rust brown took a few minutes, plus drying time and did the trick.

I compared the 3rd version (Arlie 3) with 5682 first, placing

Arlie on top. The legs are very similar. 5682 front leg side seam may be a little narrower but I’m not concerned as much with that as I am the difference in crotch both as to the shape in the front curve and how Airlie3 angles out at the front waist.  Both have had 1″ added at CF.  5682 should actually jut out there even further as it has an attached fly facing.  The difference in front crotch length is due to the difference in waist band width.

The back surprised me. The legs look much alike. I’m stunned by the difference in the back crotch angel. That’s 1+” on the 5682.  If youclick the back pic, also note how the back leg angels at the knee. OK, I should smooth out that curve, but I don’t think a mere smoothing will offset the 3/8″ more fabric at the knee the 5682 sports.

Reversing so that 5682 is on top:

is even more surprising. White interesting bits of Airlie peep out along the edge and crotch, ignore the extra at the top back; Airlie doesn’t need a back yoke 5682 does.

Moving onto DG2

Myabe not too much info there. DG2 seems to almost completely cover 5682.  If I had been asked before this experiment, I would have guessed the stretch jeans to be much smaller than the pattern drafted for non-woven fabrics. To my surprise that’s not the significant difference.   If you click the pics, it becomes obvious that wear has horribly stretched these out not only in the crotch but also along the waist. These are the P and not the larger waist PW jeans. I’m really wondering if I should have used this pair for pattern or comparison since it is both so old and so misshapen. In my defense, I didn’t realize the crotch would be so incredible. Look how the back crotch cannot be smoothed out to any semblance of flat. It must fold.  How do I copy a crotch like that.

There’s actually more to learn by putting 5682 tissue on top of the DG2 jean

I did not get a really good full front pic so I cropped them down to the signifiant difference.  The  crotches are very differenely shaped.  Although I’m not sharing a pic, the DG2 is much closer in shape to the Airlie crotch that my TNT 5682.  I’m surprised to see additional ease along the front inseam of DG2.  I love the way these fit (other than the P being too tight in the waist), whilst I’m always complaing about my self-sewn pants having to much ease over the back thigh which I always assummed the front also contributed. ???

I think it interesting that the DG2 back seems to be stretch out a bit just before the crotch curve.  Is it stretch for my rear? Other than the wear-shaped crotches (which I find hard to evaluate), what I notice the most is having about an extra 1/2″ on each side of the leg over the knee.  My DG2’s usually develop permanent horizontal stretch marks in back of the knee BUT not the diagonal drag lines I see on nearly all my self-sewn pants. Well heck, I see at least a little  knee diagonal on all my pants including  RTW that’s not a trouser.  I’ve tried shifting the pant-leg over and a few other suggestions. Any leg is fitted, will have knee diagonals when I put it on.  As long as they’re small and especially if they merge into horizontal knee wrinkles, I just ignore them. They’re on the back, so really not that hard to ignore.

This little exercise took me a couple of hours. I needed to prep 5692 the day before and press all the pattern/jeans pieces just before starting.  I take multiple photos trying to get not only the stuff I want to show but show it without blurring or color shift. So I wasted/spent lots of time taking pics.   That aside, I really do have lots of information to think about.  Where the pants are different is interesting to me and sometimes  unexpected; as were some of the places the pants/patterns were the same. It’s a great relief for me to know I don’t have to hunt down 40% stretch fabrics to use Airlie (if I ever fit Airlie). It may even be possible to use a non-stretch fabric with this pattern that specified a fabric with 40% stretch.  The difference in the back crotch between 5682 and Airlie3 was totally unexpected. I believe the Airlie started very close to the same shape as 5682. That’s something to check and test; as is the angle change of the inseam which adds more ease by my knee.  Ummm, much to think about. Very much.

 

5682 - Jeans, Arlie W/Video

Corded Pants with Airlie Pocket

I bought a lovely stripe shirting, 100% cotton,  on-line in the middle of last winter.  I was think of a nice, cheerful shirt. A sun-shiny shirt. However as soon as I lifted it from the UPS box, I knew this was not destined for my back. It’s a lot closer in nature, even after a wash, to cotton duck than to cotton shirting. It’s heavier, firmer, more fully bodied. Not really crisp–like I’d expect cotton shirting. Definitely not shirt worthy.  Might make a lightweight jacket (especially with interfacings and other finishes), but I really see it as summer pants for me.  Not winter. No, I wear dull and at least darker colors during winter. Not because of any depressed outlook, but simply because they are much better at being wearable after the road splash which always occurs winter and spring. Anyway, it has not set in the stash all that long. It’s number came up after I finished the side-tied knit top.  That was yellow, which had me digging around in my other yellows and because it is summer, it seemed like the yellow, cotton, corded shirting should be used now.

I used my much-loved Butterick 5682. It’s a non-stretch jeans pattern but I love the fit and have pressed it into service as an all around slim-pant pattern. I’m going to confess that the final fit is not 100% pleasing to me. Me like about 70%.  I made a couple of errors. Firstly, I truly wanted to use the Airlie pant pocket even if I couldn’t fit the Airlie pant. Truly, that pocket was why I bought the pattern.  Even before the pattern arrived and I decided to attempt fitting, I was envisioning transferring the pocket to both Silhouette Patterns 3200 and this 5682.  I knew I would need some adjustments for the pocket to work on a different pattern.  OK, so already I’m planning changes which I hope will be minor. I take the untested 5682 pocket pattern, duplicate it for the facing and trace the Airlie pocket facing onto my new facing. Before we go any further, did you catch that “untested”?  Because it’s my mistake.  I used an untested, unverified pattern to make further changes.  I can’t explain why I just completely spaced the fact that my pants pattern has been adapted to fit me, but the pocket had not been altered to fit my pants pattern.  Now the 5682 pocket probably needs only small changes. But it is still an error to use the unadapted pattern piece.  And the problem with small errors is they accumulate.  I’m lucky that the pant front fits as well as it does. To the jury-rigging that had to made for the pocket to fit and look as nicely as it does

I have to add an issue at the center front.  During the zipper application, my zipper facing would not fold and stitch nicely at the 1.5″ it is drafted/adapted. Partly this because I add a wedge at CF for tummy room. Most fabrics cooperate and fold along the new line.  This corded cotton would not.  If folded the way I wanted, big ripples formed along the stitching line and at the bottom of the stitching.  Just what you want right? Everyone looking and asking, “What’s wrong with your crotch?”  You know they don’t me you; they mean your pants, but when said aloud it sounds as if you suddenly developed a new disability. Right? So in the end, Oh and as Peggy  says “The fabric always wins.”,  I sewed the zipper in as the fabric allowed.

Bottom line, I have both some wonkiness from the pocket application and some wonkiness caused by not enough tummy room.  I am grateful that they fit as well as they do.

I am however extremely pleased with my waistband:

I haven’t used a squared-off, front, waistband application in years.  One of the reasons I quit is because it is difficult to turn a perfectly squared extension. The lumpiness will drive you nuts. I’m not crazy this time because I anticipated and sometimes just avoided things.  I did not stitch across the waistband and then back to the pant at the Wb lower edge. Nope, I stitched straight down across the end; Frey checked and carefully trimmed and clipped the end before inverting it.  It wanted to be lumpy, so I pulled out my rubber mallet and brick and whacked it a few times.  Once it submitted, I folded up the lower edge; whacked it too. When those ends in full submission, I top-stitched.  It turned out really nice because I was really mean.

Another questionable decision was in my elastic choice. I nearly always run elastic inside the waistbands after discovering this was the ‘secret’ of RTW. If RTW doesn’t have back-gap, it’s because of the barely discernible elastic.  Or your bought couture.   Anyway, I chose my elastic by the fact I wanted it white and 1-1/4″ wide. I measured it by wrapping around my naked waist (just dropped the clothes to hip level–no real show) and overlapping the ends till it was firmly against my skin.  Turned out to be 34″ which is typical for me. However inside the waistband, it seems to be really stretching; almost over-stretched. Worse, while it felt comfortably close during measuring, it seems too loose when the pant is worn.  I don’t like this, but until my next WAWAK order arrives, I think I’m stuck with it.

But it all comes down to the less than perfect front and sides above, and the even less perfect back:

Sigh, so it isn’t my usual excellent fit. That does happen i.e. the same pant pattern does not fit exactly the same with a different fabric.  It looks to me as if the sides and back  are drooping. If that’s the case, when the new elastic arrives and is installed I will have beautifully fitting pants. Until then, I think I’ll just cope.  The fabric is sun-shiny cheerful and the pants feel great to wear.

 

 

Airlie, StyleArc

Airlie: Recut

I did mention I had visions of recutting? Yes? So I ripped out all the stitching and hung the pieces in the closet overnight. This fabric, cannot be pressed!  I thought it was supposed to be polyester.Don’t think so. Spritz with a little water and allow the pants to hang over night praying that’s enough to pull out any wrinkles. Next, where to start this recut/revised muslin? What adjustments to take forward? What to ditch? What to add?

Well I had decided to fold-out 1″ horizontally across the torso of the pant( I showed that in one of the previous fitting pics). Did you realize that while it made the torso fit and look better, the legs were shorter. So even though I won’t be able to add length for the recut, I changed the leg to remove 1″ from leg length. Next yes removing 1″ from the torso length made the pant hang higher on my body and made the leg appear shorter.  I kept the needed CF wedge and  the 1/2″ added to both front extension.  When I checked the back extension, I found I had added 3/4″. I adjusted it back to 1/2″  I’m not sure, I could need more length, then again, I may not. For now, both muslins, especially #1 looked good with 1″ total extra crotch length.  I had thought the 2″ of seat room was too much when I added it to the tissue, but I used it anyway. I reasoned I’d rather have too much than too little. With Muslin 2 fit by increasing both side and CB seams I knew it was too much.  For the Recut, I decreased the additional seat room to a total of 1/2″ ( sliding the block over only 1/4″) taped and redrew crotch and inseam.

Then I cut a 3rd Back tissue. Why? Because I decided to test Jen’s diagonal dart for Jeans on this slim pant pattern.  I feel like, I’m close. I see so many good features with the Airlie.  If the diagonal dart is a mistake, I’d rather be able to start over at the point things were right. So I cut Back Tissue #3,  folded out a diagonal dart starting below the inseam notch, crossing the thigh and upward to the side seam.  My dart rapidly progressed from zip at the inseam to 1″ under the sea and 2.25 by the time it reached the side seam.  Well that’s not going to work when the side seams are sewn together. The amount of the side seam removed by the dart has to be offset. At the top of the side seam (waistband), I drew an upward line 2.5″ ie. the same as removed by the dart; and  joined that line with the  CB.   Maybe one of the reasons I’ve not adhered to using this diagonal dart is all the work it involves. You must make a muslin to determine where and how deep the dart needs to be and then a 2nd muslin to be sure it was correct.   I wish I could somehow combine the adjustments, but previously I found it just doesn’t produce the same result. It’s rather like a mathematical problem which must be solved in a specific order.  Each alteration affects the others and each must be done in turn to produce the desired result.  It’s scary too.I’m always wondering if I’ve made a huge mistake when I reach this point…

Which had to be smooved

but I panicked when I saw this:

Had to stop and think. OK excess fabric above the waist is correct. The horizontal tuck would have pulled the pant shorter and created that.  CB and side excess?? When I reduced the extra seat room that should have decreased the hip width 3/4″ almost back to draft.  I thought more fabric would be removed lower in the leg, not up there by the torso. But maybe it has to be removed up there?  I mean we always remove length across the torso to eliminate the mess under the seat. This could be right.  But I’m still not sure. I pulled out Back 2 and compared it with this new tissue. The difference seen on the fabric was reflected in the difference between the tissues (Doesn’t show in a pic because both pieces are white which photos about as well as 2 pieces of black.)

Then I cut fabric. Still uneasy, I basted the side seams at 3/8″ instead of 3/4″ used on Muslin 2. Not finishing seams, hemming and all that other stuff that takes a garment from wearable to great, well not doing that means the Recut was ready for pics in less than an hour.

I’d say the sides and front are not bad

If it wasn’t for this fabric to show every curve in disgusting deatil, I might wear these.  Sigh, the back…

makes me feel like giving up. OK Good stuff. The waistband is sitting horizontal. I both see and feel that but there is still sort of a poof at the CB.  Does not appear too tight across the seat i.e. it the light isn’t bouncing off of ol’ Betty blinding me in the process.  But the leg wrinkles. Counting left leg only, 3 downward diagonal meet at the inseam; one horizontal and one upward at the knee. Because this is a solid, I can’t really see the fabric being pulled upward towards the crotch like I did with Muslin 1.  There are definately less wrinkles on the back leg and much fewer if any point towards the crotch. The question would be: Is another diagonal dart needed? I remember my communications with Jen the first time I encountered the diagonal dart.  In essence, yes you can increase the depth of the  diagonal dart and change it’s angle but it distorts the pattern more and more to a point where the pattern is unusable.  She actually suggested trying to scoop the crotch once the dart was deeper than 1″ (remember this was several years ago and further experience could have changed her mind.)

I opted to first increase the side seams and take pics.

I always put off scooping until nothing else has an effect because there is no going back from a scoop.  Once the fabric has been cut away, the pants are done whether you are or not.  So thinking  all else had been tried, I scooped the crotch and took pics.:

At this point, I’m concluding  a very slim pant is just not a good choice for me. Even my 5682, supposedly a close jean pant, has an 17″ hem circumference.

 

I did enjoy sewing with this  pattern.  Absolutely envy all of you who can fit Style Arc pants.  I’m still interested in the pocket and I will copy the pieces and adapt for one of the pant patterns that I did fit to myself.

 

 

 

*******************************

Just for the record

Beginning Alterations Summary:

  • -1″ leg length
  • 1″ horizontal tuck across front and back
  • +1 CF wedge
  • +1″ length to CF at Waist
  • +1/2? Front Crotch Extension using the 1″ slash and spread method
  • +1/2″ Back Crotch Extension using the 1″ slash and spread
  • +1/4″ Seat Room via Korfiati method
  • May need more
    Diagonal dart 1″ at deepest. Starting (zeroing) at inseam notch, cross under seat terminate at side seam at prominent seat
    Measure amount lost at side seam 2.5″. Draw an upward line at Side seam waist that length (2.5″)
    Connect to CB .

FINAL

All the above, plu scooped back crotch 1/2″

 

Airlie, StyleArc

SA Airlie: Muslin 2

When I’m stumped, as I was several weeks ago with Muslin 1 of Airlie, stopping to think is a really good idea. Granted, I stopped to work on adding crotch length and finishing some of my other, half-done projects,  but the point is instead of rushing forward, I gave the Airlie fitting issue a light touch.  I allowed my brain to contemplate the total pant while I busied myself otherwise. That gave my Librarian the time to find answers like the one flashing me in  back-view pictures of Fit1, Fit2 and Fit3.

All 3 pics show the much lighter, more stretched area right across my rear which indicates not enough seat room . It’s hidden, somewhat, by the print, the darkish fabric and the fact I expect a little shadowing beneath my prominent seat.

Usually I skirt-the-issue (prominent seat) by adding 1″ fit-insurance along the side seams. That works, to a point but causes an additional problem:  increase in the total hem circumference. I care  especially with pants and typically, over the next several iterations, slim the leg and hem. But since I’ve stopped the fit process of Airlie,  I’m going to tackle this issue head-on. What alteration does the prominent seat need?  A search in my Pinterest Folder turned up these possibilities.

 

 

The first adds circumference and does not re-shape the side seam. Important because if those seams don’t match, sewing is difficult and can affect fit.  But it will add additional crotch length. I’m already removing crotch length. This will be a problem.  In the past, I’ve tried just a vertical slash and spread .  Didn’t work well. The tissue became distorted which led to other problems; more problems than it solved.   The 2nd diagram from Korfiati is much more intriguing.  It, too does not reshape the side seam; adds width at the seat AND  maybe length along the back crotch extension ? Holy cow! Two birds with 1 stone? Two problems solved? This could be a winner.  Of course a new muslin is in order.   Oh and a new tracing.  Then some alterations, some repeats from Muslin1 after all it wasn’t a complete failure:

  • -2″ leg length
  • +1″ CF wedge
  • +1″ length at top of CF. (the other half of tummy fitting)
  • +1/2″ Front Crotch Extension using the 1″ slash and spread method
  • +1/2″ Back Crotch Extension using the 1″ slash and spread
    • I think Korfiati adds some length, but I’m not sure, I’d rather add now and trim away later
  • +1″ Butt Room via Korfiati method.
  • +5/8″ side seams

So  I don’t think I’m going to be ‘there’ i.e. fitted pattern with this muslin but I need to tests these ideas. For Muslin2, I’m working with a ‘scuba knit’ purchased a few years ago.  I bought it after  reading rave reviews about  others fabulous scuba knit dress/pants/whatever. I was puzzled.  I’ve seen the real scuba knit on real scuba divers. That fabric is a waterproof, layered fabric. Comfortable in the water but sweltering and restricting on dryland.   I could not imagine wearing such a fabric, but it seemed everyone was raving about it.  This cheap purchase confirmed my fears.  It was not true scuba fabric for scuba suits. It was a cushy, foam layered fabric victimized by the current-day habit of using words for other than what they mean. (Apologies about the soap box. How can communication take place when we really don’t understand what each other is saying?) . I hated the fabric from the moment it arrived. Icky. Sticky. The foil like finish did not help.

OK, there may be better scuba fabric, but I never bought another piece and this one has languished in the muslin stash since it’s arrival. It was unearthed now only because it possessed the required 40% stretch. As with Muslin 1, I had fabric and pattern laid-out, cut and basted together in under an hour.  Ready for pics?

. So as not to be distracted by the foil print, I’m using the inside as the outside (public side), however, this burnt orange is not more attractive and the foil is sticking to my skin. Yuk.

There is obviously too much circumference nearly everywhere. I did think that adding 2″ total (1″ slash and spread) to the butt could be too much; and in the back of my mind , I had hoped that I didn’t need the additional at the side seams. I let the hem circumference decide where to start.  My muslin hem is currently 16.5″. A size 18 (what I bought) should be 15.25″, 1.25″ less or 5/16 less on each side seam.  A size 20 (what I probably should have purchased) should finish at 15.75, 3/4″ less or 3/16″ less each side seam. Now, I might prefer the size 20 hem circ. I find the 13,14,15″ hem circumferences challenging (at times) and always require removal of shoe–even in freezing winter.  But, I’m working with the size 18 and so instead of the 1/2″ SA I used, I will increase that to 3/4″. (Should be 13/16 but that’s hard to achieve the way my throat plate is marked.

Next, I’m always try to get my waist situated at the waist. The front is rising too high. I’m surprised because I also added 1/2″ crotch extension, 1″ front wedge and 1″ to the crotch upright of to Muslin 2 .I did not  trim Muslin 2;  I offset the waist band with the top of the pant to remove the 1/2″ excess length.  Not trimmed because I made some significant changes for this muslin and I’m not 100% sure I made the right choices on anything. I don’t like making 2 changes at a time let alone the 3rd made. The sides and back all said too, too much ease. I also increased the CB seam from 3/8 to 5/8″ just along the upright.  Nothing to the crotch curve itself and not trimmed.  In the back of my mind I have the idea of transferring successful adjustments to the tissue and recutting the muslin.

Fit02, sewing is fast fitting is slow.  To my surprise, the  CF crotch is still too long. See the side view for the 1/2″ (would be 1″ total) that I pinned to be removed. Having added 1″ length for Muslin1, I’m doubly surprised this is so long.  Other wise I hate the fabric. It shows all the curves where I’d like to camo a few, like the belly flap in front. I”m trying to ignore it because otherwise my only front concern is what seems to be extra fabric between the thighs. Yes, the slash and spread does add a little more thigh circumference; and it’s distributed all the way between crotch and knee.  Perhaps that’s why I started just adding length to the end of the crotch?

contemplating the sides, and ignoring how this scuba knit reveal all I’d wish to hide, I think it says too much ease on the back. I might be able to take the sides in more, which I’m truly considering

as I contemplate the back. I’m wondering if it looks better than Fit1 or not. Fit 1 has 4 hip and 3 inseam wrinkles; Fit 2 has 5 hip, 2 horizontal at the knee and 3 inseam. Hardly an improvement. I can live with the horizontal wrinkles at the knee. That just means it’s a little closer than I’d want, but should I? Despite all the revealed curves, I like the way the back looks between waist and prominent seat. I’m not a tight laced Victorian. I do like my pants to follow my body curves just a little. Still its the wrinkles mess in the legs that concerns me. Do I work on the Inseam wrinkles, first? They are pointing upward, towards the crotch and usually indicate the crotch is not long enough. Same thing I was seeing and unable to correct with Muslin 1.  I am very disappointed in the leg wrinkles that extend from the hip.  I added 2 more inches of ease/circumference.  The front still has a bit more than I’d like. The seat looks good. So why are those wrinkles there?  I believe a 1/2″ tuck all the way around front to back is my next fitting action.  Will test both corrections for the front crotch length and the back mess.

Interesting, but an improvement? Well the front does look better. There is still too much fabric there between the thighs but not so much and not looking so bad.  The back looks nicer from a circumference perspective i.e. actually looks like there is a body in them there pants. But the wrinkles?? OMGosh! I now have 5 of those diagonal wrinkles across the upper thigh plus 6 wrinkles that dig into the inseam. I always suspect adding 2″ of seat ease would be too much. So now I removed half of that, 1″, but I did leave some. Muslin 1 said I need more seating room.

I made a 1/2″ dart covering approximately same area as the Seat+ alteration and 5″ of upper thigh.   It was supposed to be a vertical dart on grain but as you can see, it leans. Interestingly, same way the folds were leaning.  So now, I’m back to asking, was the Seat+ alteration needed? I thought it was. If not extra ease for my seat, then what?   Since I’m spending my day fitting, I dug out Muslin 1 and made the same dart in the leg as is on Muslin 2

.

I put pins along the dart so the dart would be more easily seen.  When you click on the pic you’ll st is the left leg this time which has the diagonal dart. A diagonal dart which is a lot more vertical than the one I put in M2.  First let me point out the most disgusting thing.  Muslin 1 has hung in the closet for several days.  I have pant hangar that hold the cuff and allow the waist end to dangle. Just out of the dyer, that’s sufficient to remove nearly all wrinkles. I was so surprised to see that the right leg had virtually no drag lines, but the stripes do angle upward. The left leg has maybe 2. Where’d they go?  If I were to wear the pants, would the wrinkles reappear?  So how do I know whether or not the diagonal dart is needed for this pattern?

This took me back several years to Jennifer Sterns-H Jean Class on Craftsy (as it was then known).  Jen has you make a number of measurements and adjustments that most other fitters don’t bother with.  Near the end of fitting, she had me and the few like me, pinch out this diagonal dart. Bang! My home-made jeans were beauteous. I always thought the diagonal dart was specific to the jean fit. Time passed. I fit other pants. Let’s face it the 20″ hem of my straight leg trousers (SP3200) fit themselves.  They have enough fabric my body can take what it needs from wherever it is. Shorts, which I make a lot of, don’t have the same leg problems.  I never totally understand why, but anything ending above the knee has far fewer fitting issues everywhere, not just pant legs. (Maxi dresses may be the exception but then they has oodles of fabric just like my trousers). My body changed and I struggled with fitting everything. I’ve slowly been refitting patterns and slowly returning to the sewing I love.  I’ve managed to fit 2 pant patterns without a lot tears and frustration and I’ve worked them to death. But this takes me back and I wonder, should I be incorporating the diagonal dart in every close-fitting pant?

Airlie, StyleArc

Airlie: My Fitting Issue Summary

Several days ago, I was fitting the Style Arc Airlie Pant pattern.  I was halted when a patch gusset utilized to lengthen the muslin’s crotch extensions  did not work as expected. I’ve picked up this project again, but first let’s refresh memories:

The back after sewing the muslin together:

Fit01

I counted (left leg only) 4 diagonal lines radiating upward from inseam towards hip and side;  1 radiating from knee downward towards mid-calf. I also saw some bubbling along the crotch upright,  generally  the back crotch upright is too long.  A simple offsetting the waistband 1″ lower should have helped both issues.

During the initial pattern evaluation and measuring, I noted that the very nice SA crotch was not exactly like my own.  I have the rather rare high-low crotch anomaly.  That simply means my undercarriage is not horizontal to the floor.  It is tilted slightly downward in back. It is typical for me to scoop the back crotch of my pants 1/2″ and sometimes more. Depends upon the pattern.

So before Fit02, I offset the waistband 1″ to shorten the back crotch length and then scooped the back crotch 1/2″. Then took pictures for Fit#2

Above the seat, no bubbling along the back upright (Thumbs Up), but the waistband was no longer horizontal. It clearly pulled down in the pic and I felt it.   I was horrified to count the wrinkles this time.  There are 6 (2 more than Fit1) leg diagonals and 5 along the inseam.  The lines along the inseam  usually indicate on my pants a need for additional crotch length. So I carefully cut and applied a gusset to add 1″ to both the front and back crotch extensions (total 2″). Understand with the 1/2″ added earlier I had now added 3″ to  that drafted crotch.  For all my trouble Fit3

was worse not better. The front waistband (not shown) had been  horizontal but now was rising almost touching my bra band..  The back crotch seemed to come further forward and of course the back WB dipped even lower than in Fit2. There were, however fewer wrinkles.  There were  3  leg wrinkles at the hip and 3 along the inseam.

A major issue with adding the gusset was that it did not form a nice curve.  I had to draw a curve which removed about 1.5″ of what was added by the gusset.  The end result was hardly worth the effort of the gusset.

My first thought was I needed to figure out how to lengthen the crotch without trimming away  most of the length to create a nice curve. This is where I took my break and where I am starting now.

I don’t know why exactly, but I had adopted the method of simply extended the crotch the desired amount and then drawing a new inseam curve back to the original.

That works well enough when adding 1/4-1/2″. But  larger amounts always produced the weird pyramid that needed trimming away to form a nice curve

So I hunted through my Pinterest Folder Pants->Fitting and found 2 techniques to try.

The first cuts into the crotch about 1″ away from the tip and down to the notch

Ready to try this out, I pulled out my original Airlie and traced the front and back crotches. Then I decided I needed to know, 100%, no room for doubt that the excellent draft I think I’m getting from SA, is really that good.  So the first sewing I did was a sample of the front and back crotches as SA drafted.

Sample Pattern                                               Sewn sample of Original crotch

I actually cut 2 backs and 2 fronts. Realized when joining the first back and front, I didn’t need to make a whole little pant.  All I needed was visual verification that a nice curve resulted. From here on, I cut only 1 each of a back and front.

Next up was using the 1″ Slash and Spread Adjustment to add 1/2″.

A line is drawn starting about 1″ in from the tip of the crotch (either front or back) over to the inseam notch.  The line is then cut almost all the way to the inseam which forms a hinge. The crotch is spread the desired distance, 1/2″ for me, tissue slipped beneath and everything taped down. Curve needs to be corrected just a little and then all the excess tissue can be cut away. I cut a copy of my original sample pattern and added 1/2″ to front and back before cutting another back and front from fabric and stitching together.

Not quite as smooth as the original but much better than my ol’ extend at the crotch. So I’ve been reading about a different measuring system for the crotch (can’t share because of copy right issues.)  It needs careful measuring of both body and pattern and I’m not sure I’ve got that right.  But just for fun, I wanted to try measurements which resulted and created a sample adding 1.25″ to the front and 2.25″ to the back.

I wasn’t even sure I was going to be able to spread the crotch that far. But it did and it stitched together with only a little correction to the curve. I just don’t think my measurement is right though, so when I started method 2, Slash to knee, I returned to the 1/2″ addition.

With this method, I’m calling KneeSlash, you slash into the crotch much closer to the body and extend the slash almost to the knee. Doubt that it would be wrong to slash all the way to the knee.

Amazingly, this makes a much smooth connection with the inseam and sewn it is much smoother as well.   My one concern is that it is adding more circumference in an area I’m always complaining has too much circumference to start with, the thighs. Yes, my seat not only hangs a bit low, it is large in proportion to my thighs.  With that in mind, I’m going to test the Knee Slash method with actual use at least a time or two.

So, clean up done. Half-baked projects done. Laundry as done as it ever gets (like washing dishes, the laundry is never done). So am I ready for Muslin 2?

 

3200 Sally's Pant, Shorts

First Summer Shorts

I was pretty happy with my shorts supply when I swapped out my winter for summer clothes.  I reasoned that with 6 pairs and I enough to go all summer. I knew I would want to add a pair or two just to make something new and also to keep refreshing the wardrobe. Shorts are, after all, something I can count on wearing every summer. I had a rude awakening when I started actually wearing my shorts. I had forgotten that all these were made before I finished tweaking my TNT’s, Peggy Sagers 3200 and Butterick 5682.  Pair had something seriously wrong.  One pair was fine while I was standing, but I couldn’t sit. Seriously, they had no stretch and would not give enough for my body to bend into sitting position.  How the heck did I wear those last year? I have not gained weight. The scales at my doctor’s office are steadly going down. Not rocketing to the bottom, but a pound less when I visit (my visits are quarterly). I’m 6 pounds less now then when I made the shorts. A few pulled sharply down at CB whenever I sat. Well, I have no intention of running around with my bum showing, so into the Goodwill box they went too. I’m left with 3 pairs of shorts which is not enough during hot weather. Time to start sewing shorts!

First pair is cut from a black and white stripe of cotton/poly seersucker. I don’t care whether seersucker is in or out, I love it for summer garments.  Most of my life, it’s been the fabric I could count on to look the same on a summer afternoon as it did in the morning.  I’d rather be slightly rumpled all day then to look like something the cat hacked up in the evening. KWIM?

I had already traced 3200 for shorts length. I did myself a favor by tracing it for the longest length shorts I would want and then marking fold lines along the leg for shorter versions. Now I folded it for the 4″ short.  I chalked an extra 1″ onto the sides and added 1-1/4″ length at the waist for a fold over waistband. My 4″ inseam is actually marked at the 5-1/4″ level to include the hem so no need to add for a hem. I wanted pockets so dug through my patterns until I could find what I call the CLD pocket.

The CLD pocket is really a thing of beauty.  Louise Cutting includes this pocket or instructions for it  in a number of her pants patterns.  The front side seam is faced at the pocket opening. A single pocket shape (you can vary it) is attached to the back side seam. The pocket attached to the back is placed under the front and top stitched. Yeah, so not clear. It is an easy pocket application. Has the virtue of never gaping; can be added after the fact (with a little seam ripping) and made from a scrap. But you do need to follow an exact procedure or you’ll muck it up. I did. I forgot to read the directions and missed steps resulting in some ripping and creative sewing..  Have a nice pocket, but this could have been so much easier.

I wanted to work some more with the new CS and used the 2340 to top stitch pockets and hems. Hems were fine — I’ve got a new if still awkward procedure for removing the work — but those pockets had me screaming. I used the pocket shape with sharp corners. 2340 does not make nice right angle turns. I had quite a mess..

.. which I top stitched at the sewing machine

trying to at least secure the pocket if not make it look a little better.  I was frustrated by the time I finished and even suggested, to myself, that I put the Janome back up and set the 2340 aside until I triple needles was the exact look I wanted.  But I remembered that it wasn’t all that easy when I first got the Janome 900CPX.  For months all I would do is a hemming stitch. I can remember letting out a deep relaxed sigh each time I completed a decent hem. It was months before I would try anything else. I haven had the 2340 but 3 weeks. Already I pushing it and probably myself.

Note: I can now see real advantages to my Janome 900CPX over the 2340CV.  The 900 is much easier to thread and to remove the work from machine. Removing the work from the 2340 is a real fight that seams to be accompanied by either rethreading the machine, or unintentionally raveling

the hem and having to over stitch at the sewing machine. Also, having 3 needles means threading THREE needles with THREE cones of thread. That’s just not going to happen with some colors. In which case I will be winding a bobbin to use at the 2340. I don’t like a lot of fuss. Sewing: YES. Fuss and futzing: NO. Threading is futzing.

A second goof, probably the first really because I did not add enough length for a fold over waistband.  I made it work but I must have spent 10 minutes measuring, pinning, folding etc. I think though my measuring was just a little off. These both look and feel just a little close in the crotch

Happily a little scooping took care of it but I don’t seem to have pics after the scoop.

Next time I’m going to read the pocket and waistband instructions. It’s nice to have a multitude of techniques to use, I just need to be reminded of the construction details before I cut.